<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[孤城浪子的地盘]]></title> 
<link>https://www.gclz.cn/index.php</link> 
<description><![CDATA[]]></description> 
<language>zh-cn</language> 
<copyright><![CDATA[孤城浪子的地盘]]></copyright>
<item>
<link>https://www.gclz.cn/post//</link>
<title><![CDATA[RAID 10]]></title> 
<author>孤城浪子 &lt;admin@yourname.com&gt;</author>
<category><![CDATA[网络]]></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:38:41 +0000</pubDate> 
<guid>https://www.gclz.cn/post//</guid> 
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
	<div class="entry"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<p><strong><span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10: Very High Reliability combined with High Performance <br /></strong></p><p><strong><span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10:非常高可靠性与高性能的组合</strong></p> <p><strong>Characteristics/Advantages</strong></p><p><strong>特征与优点<br /></strong></p> <p>1. <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 is implemented as a striped array whose segments are <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 1 arrays</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 用了<span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 1 的带区阵列<br /></p> <p>2. <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 has the same fault tolerance as <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> level 1</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 与 <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 1有相同的容错性</p> <p>3. <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 has the same overhead for fault-tolerance as mirroring alone</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 和镜像比有相同的开销<br /> </p> <p>4. High I/O rates are achieved by striping <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 1 segments</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 传输速度比RAID 1快<br /></p> <p>5. Under certain circumstances, <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 array can sustain multiple simultaneous drive failures</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 某些情况下，RAID 10阵列在多个硬盘故障的情况下仍然能正常工作<br /></p> <p>6. Excellent solution for sites that would have otherwise gone with <span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 1 but need some additional performance boost</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 替换RAID1的最佳方案<br /></p> <p><strong>Disadvantages</strong></p><p><strong>缺点<br /></strong></p> <p>7. Very expensive / High overhead</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 很贵<br /></p> <p>8. All drives must move in parallel to proper track lowering sustained performance</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 所有硬盘并行运行降低了持续的性能<br /></p> <p>9. Very limited scalability at a very high inherent cost</p> <p><strong>Recommended Applications 推荐用途</strong></p><p>Database server requiring high performance and fault tolerance</p>数据库服务器需要高性能、极低的故障率 <p><strong><img src="http://www.sansky.net/wp-content/2007/06/windowslivewriterraid10-9ce9clip-image002.gif" border="0" width="1" height="30" /><img style="width: 480px; height: 200px" src="http://www.sansky.net/wp-content/2007/06/windowslivewriterraid10-9ce9clip-image003.gif" border="0" width="480" height="200" /></strong></p> <p><span class="st_tag internal_tag">RAID</span> 10 需要最少4个硬盘才能实现</p> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
]]>
</description>
</item><item>
<link>https://www.gclz.cn/post//#blogcomment</link>
<title><![CDATA[[评论] RAID 10]]></title> 
<author> &lt;user@domain.com&gt;</author>
<category><![CDATA[评论]]></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> 
<guid>https://www.gclz.cn/post//#blogcomment</guid> 
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
	
]]>
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>